| filename | linenumber | description |
| ft_appenddata.m | 179 | create the output from scratch and don't use the first varargin |
| ft_appenddata.m | 183 | think whether this can ever happen |
| ft_appenddata.m | 198 | is not entirely robust if the different inputs have different |
| ft_artifact_ecg.m | 212 | , at present this only works for continuous data: the assumption can |
| ft_channelnormalise.m | 70 | this can be kept, provided the scaling is built in appropriately |
| ft_combineplanar.m | 216 | ? |
| ft_componentanalysis.m | 365 | , this is not properly supported yet |
| ft_componentanalysis.m | 375 | , this is not properly supported yet |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 63 | do method specific calls to checkconfig |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 90 | old-fashioned pcc data |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 95 | check which methods require hasrpt |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 127 | think of accommodating partial coherence for source data with only a few references |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 150 | could also work with time domain data |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 176 | throw an error if cfg.complex~='abs', and dojack==1 |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 177 | throw an error if no replicates and cfg.method='plv' |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 178 | trial selection has to be implemented still |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 257 | consider keeping track of which channels have been partialised |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 391 | do we really need this, or is this related to how |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 430 | do we really need this, or is this related to how |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 564 | adjust dimord (remove rpt in dojack && hasrpt case) |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 587 | this is not correct for TF-representations when trials have |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 652 | this only works for data without time dimension |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 736 | this is probably not correct |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 929 | this is strictly only true for jackknife, otherwise other bias is needed |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 949 | speed up code and check |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1000 | rewrite to allow for multiple blocks |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1001 | change cfg.block functionality in this case |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1111 | speed up code and check |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1230 | why the +1? get the coherence |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1349 | only works for 1 frequency |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1362 | this assumes only 1 freq bin |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1392 | this assumes dimord to be 'rpttap_…' |
| ft_connectivityanalysis.m | 1402 | hard coded |
| ft_connectivitysimulation.m | 109 | think about this |
| ft_databrowser.m | 158 | how is this supposed to work? |
| ft_databrowser.m | 309 | ? |
| ft_databrowser.m | 579 | this is only for debugging |
| ft_databrowser.m | 1050 | implement further details |
| ft_dipolefitting.m | 531 | this should be renamed (if possible w.r.t. EEGLAB) |
| ft_dipolefitting.m | 532 | this should be renamed (if possible w.r.t. EEGLAB) |
| ft_dipolefitting.m | 537 | assign Vdata to an output variable, idem for the model potential |
| ft_dipolefitting.m | 541 | assign Vdata to an output variable, idem for the model potential |
| ft_electroderealign.m | 350 | change the flow in the remainder |
| ft_electroderealign.m | 433 | interactive realigning to template electrodes is not yet supported |
| ft_freqanalysis_mtmconvol.m | 300 | this works only if all frequencies have the same number of tapers |
| ft_freqanalysis_mvar.m | 64 | build in repetitions |
| ft_freqgrandaverage.m | 25 | averaging coherence is not possible if inputs contain different amounts of data (i.e. chan/freq/time) |
| ft_freqstatistics.m | 85 | at this moment (=2 April) this does not work, because the input might not always have a powspctrm o.i.d. |
| ft_headmodelplot.m | 126 | why is this empty setting neccessary? |
| ft_interactiverealign.m | 98 | pass this as appdata |
| ft_interactiverealign.m | 315 | also plot lines? |
| ft_interactiverealign.m | 322 | also plot lines? |
| ft_interactiverealign.m | 326 | this only works for boundary element models |
| ft_interactiverealign.m | 342 | this only works for boundary element models |
| ft_megrealign.m | 222 | this assumes that coils and sensors coincide, this is generally not |
| ft_mvaranalysis.m | 263 | think about this |
| ft_mvaranalysis.m | 297 | check which is which: X(t) = A1*X(t-1) + … + An*X(t-n) + E |
| ft_prepare_layout.m | 535 | there is a conflict between the use of cfg.style here and in topoplot |
| ft_preprocessing.m | 214 | this should be handled by checkconfig, but checkconfig does not allow yet for |
| ft_singleplotER.m | 238 | : variable colorLabels is not used out sashae |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 412 | it was incorrect , since the |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 536 | , should be averaged and repeated for each trial |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 537 | , should be averaged and repeated for each trial |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 538 | , should be averaged and repeated for each trial |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 901 | , add the component numbers to the output |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 951 | , convert the source reconstruction back to a frequency representation |
| ft_sourceanalysis.m | 953 | , convert the source reconstruction back to a component representation |
| ft_sourcedescriptives.m | 240 | in the presence of a refdip and/or supdip, this does not work; leadfield is Nx3 |
| ft_sourcedescriptives.m | 242 | this is a proposed dirty fix |
| ft_sourcedescriptives.m | 327 | kan volgens mij niet |
| ft_sourcedescriptives.m | 451 | this only makes sense when only a reference signal OR a dipole is selected |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 153 | implement roi-based statistics for the new implementation |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 184 | only supported for old-style source representation |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 231 | selectdata should be used for the subselection |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 232 | selectdata has to be adjusted to work with new style source data |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 509 | think of how this generalizes to volumetric data (boolean inside etc) |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 544 | what about volumetric data? |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 567 | this assumes positions to be in the first dimension always |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 568 | what about volumetric dadta |
| ft_sourcestatistics.m | 584 | take the intersection between all inputs |
| ft_spikedetection.m | 355 | implement variable length waveforms |
| ft_spikedetection.m | 361 | implement a peak shift |
| ft_timelockanalysis.m | 35 | if input is one raw trial, the covariance is not computed correctly |
| ft_timelockstatistics.m | 80 | at this moment (=10 May) this does not work, because the input might not always have an avg |
| ft_topoplotER.m | 428 | ? |
| ft_volumewrite.m | 141 | determine the voxel index of the fiducials |
| ft_volumewrite.m | 167 | determine the voxel index of the coordinate system origin |
| ft_volumewrite.m | 294 | , this is not functional at the moment, since earlier in this function all nans have been replaced by zeros |
| ft_volumewrite.m | 370 | , this currently does not work due to all flipping and permuting |
| loreta2fieldtrip.m | 62 | the transformation matrix should be assigned properly |
| loreta2fieldtrip.m | 105 | someone should figure out how to interpret the activity |
| source2full.m | 57 | this assumes that the voxel data are ordered as if in a regularly spaced 3D grid, |
| source2full.m | 83 | the following is a bit experimental and not fully tested yet it works in general case |
| sourcestatistics_parametric.m | 41 | this function should use parameterselection and getsubfield |
| sourcestatistics_parametric.m | 204 | this leads to a different df for each source location |
| sourcestatistics_randcluster.m | 66 | this function should use parameterselection and getsubfield |
| sourcestatistics_randomization.m | 35 | this function should use parameterselection and getsubfield |
| statistics_stats.m | 228 | , the probability is returned for each factor separately |
| topoplot.m | 479 | , according to Ingrid and Robert (19 Oct 2009), these deltas probably should be 0 |
| private/bti2grad.m | 38 | check whether anyone actually uses this code |
| private/bti2grad.m | 134 | check whether ori is OK for gradiometers |
| private/bti2grad.m | 177 | this is hard coded according to a few tests |
| private/channelposition.m | 166 | not sure whether this will work |
| private/convert_event.m | 137 | ? |
| private/denoise_artifact.m | 72 | , this assumes that all artifacts are equally long |
| private/fourier2crsspctrm.m | 70 | ? |
| private/headsurface.m | 201 | in case of a icosahedron projected onto a localspheres model, the |
| private/mergeconfig.m | 12 | also deal with configuration objects |
| private/mergeconfig.m | 17 | also deal with configuration objects |
| private/parameterselection.m | 101 | 'pos' in dimord is not OK |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 99 | move to cfg.grid |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 105 | move to cfg.grid |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 111 | move to cfg.grid |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 117 | move spheremesh to cfg.grid |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 132 | move to cfg.grid |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 206 | is it desirable to have this in the grid? |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 210 | is it desirable to have this in the grid? |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 214 | is it desirable to have this in the grid? |
| private/prepare_dipole_grid.m | 409 | use inside_vol instead of this replication of code |
| private/prepare_freq_matrices.m | 112 | this fails in case dimord=rpt_chan_freq and only 1 trial |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 36 | : control slice's cmap referred to abs values |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 37 | : clean structure slicedata |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 38 | : check function assign3dpoints |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 46 | why is this in cfg? |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 56 | give a warning or so? |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 759 | : obsolete: replaced by headshape at the beginning |
| private/prepare_mesh_manual.m | 764 | : make it work for pre-loaded meshes |
| private/prepare_resampled_data.m | 104 | for averaging the number of conditions can also be larger than 1 |
| private/prepare_resampled_data.m | 107 | for randomization the number of conditions can already be larger than 2 |
| private/read_besa_swf.m | 87 | , here combine the channels of the regional sources |
| private/read_besa_tfc.m | 82 | the following statement does not work for Matlab 7.2 on XP (see mail from Stephan Bickel) |
| private/read_neuralynx_nst.m | 109 | apply the scaling factor from ADBitVolts and convert to uV |
| private/read_neuralynx_ntt.m | 109 | apply the scaling factor from ADBitVolts and convert to uV |
| private/resampledesign.m | 202 | allow for length(cfg.uvar)>1, does it make sense in the first place |
| private/specest_tfr.m | 144 | add width |
| private/statistics_wrapper.m | 481 | this is old code should be removed |
| private/statistics_wrapper.m | 503 | : this was obviously wrong, because often trial-data is one-dimensional, so no dimensional information is present |
| private/surfaceorientation.m | 40 | there is a bug in solid_angle resulting in negative values where they should be positive and vice versa |
| private/wizard_base.m | 79 | this does not work |
| private/wizard_base.m | 82 | this does not always work correctly |
| private/write_plexon_nex.m | 115 | ? |