should there be figures added to this page, or is the code enough?
% the two example files with the 151 and 275 channel CTF specifications are available from % ftp://ftp.fcdonders.nl/pub/fieldtrip/examples/megrealign grad151 = ft_read_sens('ctf151.mat'); grad275 = ft_read_sens('ctf275.mat'); vol = []; vol.r = 12; vol.o = [0 0 4]; % in this example the dipole is carefully positioned on the same depth as % where the dipole layer for the interpolation will be located. The center % of the head is at [0 0 4], the radius is 12 cm, and the dipole layer that is % specified in ft_megrealign is 2.5 cm shifted inward from the head surface cfg = []; cfg.dip.pos = [0 0 13.5]; % 4 + 12 - 2.5 cfg.dip.frequency = 1; cfg.vol = vol; cfg.grad = grad151; data151 = ft_dipolesimulation(cfg); cfg.grad = grad275; data275 = ft_dipolesimulation(cfg); cfg = []; avg151 = ft_timelockanalysis(cfg, data151); avg275 = ft_timelockanalysis(cfg, data275); % here I'll not only realign the 151 channel MEG data to the 275 channel and % vice versa, but also apply the ft_megrealign function from 151 to 151. In the % realignment the signal will be slightly distorted as a comparison of avg151_151 % to avg151 would show. cfg = []; cfg.inwardshift = 3; cfg.vol = vol; cfg.template = {'ctf151.mat'}; avg151_151 = ft_timelockanalysis([], ft_megrealign(cfg, avg151)); cfg.template = {'ctf275.mat'}; avg151_275 = ft_timelockanalysis([], ft_megrealign(cfg, avg151)); cfg.template = {'ctf151.mat'}; avg275_151 = ft_timelockanalysis([], ft_megrealign(cfg, avg275)); cfg.template = {'ctf275.mat'}; avg275_275 = ft_timelockanalysis([], ft_megrealign(cfg, avg275));
% plot the realigned datasets
cfg = [];
figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg151_151);
title('Interpolated from 151 to 151');
orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 avg151_151.png
figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg151_275);
title('Interpolated from 151 to 151');
orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 avg151_275.png
figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg275_151);
title('Interpolated from 151 to 151');
orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 avg275_151.png
figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg275_275);
title('Interpolated from 151 to 151');
orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 avg275_275.png
% now plot them together cfg = []; figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg151, avg151_151, avg275_151); orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 compare151.png
figure; ft_multiplotER(cfg, avg275, avg275_275, avg151_275); orient portrait; print -dpng -r300 compare275.png